Now Reading
The Evolution of Google’s Panda Update
3

The Evolution of Google’s Panda Update

by Ben Wittams-Smith7th April 2015

The Evolution Of Google’s Panda

Over-time as newer Panda updates have been released, the face of the search results have changed

The Panda algorithmic update was designed to help determine the ranking of a website based on its onsite factors. Once the update was first released in 2011, websites saw major hits to their rankings if their content was of a poor quality.

The update was originally referred to as the Farmers Update, because of the fact that it targeted content farms, and websites with a high number of pages containing low quality content.

 

Onsite Factors Considered by Panda

Panda takes into account onsite multiple factors when impacting a website’s ranking. The following are the important ranking factors that have been included within Panda over-time:

Thin Content: Pages that have very little content (e.g. 100-200 words) can be penalised for lacking substantial content.

Ads Above the Fold: Having three to four adverts above the fold, rather than useful content, can have a negative impact on a sites rankability.

Keyword Over-Optimisation: Having a keyword spammed multiple times on a page needlessly may be picked up and count against a site’s rankings.

Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) Keyword Use: These are words that are semantically related to the pages subject area, and help Google define the sector that the page belongs in.

Duplicate Content: Having content repeated within your site, or using content that is indexed on another website.

Broken Links and 404 Pages: Having links that do not lead anywhere will negatively impact your sites rankings.

Poor Quality Content Having pages with content that contains many spelling mistakes and grammatical errors will likely affect a site’s rankability.

 

Understanding how Panda has developed can help protect your site against future updates

The trend has been moving toward providing more valuable content to users. At present, Panda updates are not completely effective when it comes to gauging the true value of content, especially as this is very subjective.

However the Panda updates are moving in the direction of ranking websites higher that provide high quality content, and penalising websites that provide poorly written, or unoriginal content. For this reason, you can benefit from doing the following:

• Publishing content that provides something original
• Minimising the loading times of your webpages
• Sharing other valuable content (i.e. linking out to high quality pages on other websites)
• Avoiding over-optimisation of keywords

Ultimately the best way to avoid being penalised by the Panda updates is to create a high quality website, which provides original content, and a fantastic user experience. It’s still possible to rank a website while providing little or no value to visitors, however you will always be looking over your shoulder, anticipating the moment that Panda catches up to you and takes a bit out of your search engine rankings.

Enjoyed this Article?

Signup now and receive articles like this directly to your inbox!

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

About The Author
Ben Wittams-Smith
Ben Wittams-Smith is a content writer for Just SEO and the Company Director of JSEO LTD. As a specialist in SEO, SEM and digital marketing, Ben regularly contributes content and provides analytic insight in these areas.
  • Greg
    8th April 2015 at 10:21 am

    Easier said than done, but it’s 100% true – original high quality content that is valuable for the visitors is treated better by search engines. I used to have problems with duplicate content on my website, but when I located and eliminated duplictes and wrote new content it turned out to be beneficial for my page rank.

  • Gills
    8th April 2015 at 1:39 pm

    Hi,

    Detailed one..but I have found some mismatching dates of update. (Sorry, If I’m wrong)

    Regards

  • 10th April 2015 at 11:05 am

    Hi Gills – thanks for commenting – any errors in the dates have been removed 🙂

Leave a Response